Philip Blundell writes:
> Russell King wrote:
> >Err, not as far as I know.
> What are you referring to?
The 2.3 CVS tree.
> >The loader is free software, just not open-sourced.
>
> `Free software' in the GNU sense means that the source is available, you can
> modify it, redistribute it and so on. As I understand it !Linux is zero-cost
> software which is not the same. My apologies if I have misrepresented the
> licence terms.
I'd like it to be open-sourced, but I just don't see that this is possible with
any RISC OS-based development system. Any changes would have to be hand-patched
into the sources since there is no diff/patch utility that I am aware of, which
makes it impractical.
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/armlinux.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++ Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for ++
++ kernel-related discussions. ++
