Pieter Truter writes:
> The problem is that I can ping remote system from my board and the
> remote system reply to the ping. However, the network stack rejects the
> IP packet based on a bad IP header CRC claculated with ip_fast_csum() in
> net/ipv4/ip_input.c.

Can you provide statistics and a packet dump of an incorrect packet please?

> So it appears that my network device driver works OK. I am tracing =
> through the network code to find the problem, but I cannot imagine that =
> I am the first/only person using the network on an ARM system.

No you are not, and I don't see any problems here with IP header checksums:

sturm, my 2.3.99-pre6 test box:
uname -a
Linux sturm 2.3.99-pre6 #735 Sat May 6 13:56:28 BST 2000 armv4l unknown

uptime:
 11:18pm  up 2 days,  9:47,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

/proc/net/snmp:
Forwarding              2
DefaultTTL              64
InReceives              85980
InHdrErrors             0
InAddrErrors            0
ForwDatagrams           0
InUnknownProtos         0
InDiscards              0
InDelivers              81768
OutRequests             72176
OutDiscards             0
OutNoRoutes             0
ReasmTimeout            0
ReasmReqds              83
ReasmOKs                29
ReasmFails              0
FragOKs                 0
FragFails               0
FragCreates             1081

This machine has been talking (NFS) to other ARM Linux based machines,
as well as an x86 Linux laptop, and the net without problems.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  |   |        Russell King       [EMAIL PROTECTED]      --- ---
  | | | |            http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/            /  /  |
  | +-+-+                                                     --- -+-
  /   |               THE developer of ARM Linux              |+| /|\
 /  | | |                                                     ---  |
    +-+-+ -------------------------------------------------  /\\\  |

unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++        Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for           ++
++                        kernel-related discussions.                      ++

Reply via email to