>I've had little feedback on the current form of the non-sequential >(non-causal) extensions to LADSPA. I'm wondering if this is because > >(a) They're perfect ;-) >(b) People don't find them interesting/useful. >(c) I've made them incoherent and they aren't well understood. >(d) Everyone's too busy with the holiday season. In my case its about 50% (c) ("not well understood) and 50% (b) ("don't find them useful"). But thats mostly because my concerns (for now) are with RT plugin application, and perhaps because of (c) or perhaps because of fundamental issues, I don't see how they are relevant in that instance. --p
- [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Extension: ... Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... David Olofson
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Paul Barton-Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSP... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential L... Jack O'Quin
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Paul Barton-Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSP... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential L... Paul Barton-Davis