On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:27 +0200, N. Gey wrote: > Georg Holzmann schrieb: > > yep. maybe the gstreamer way is a possible solutions, or something > > similar. they have three categories: good, bad and ugly (which are > > also different packages): > > > > -------8<-------- > > gst-plugins-good: a set of good-quality plug-ins under our preferred > > license, LGPL > > gst-plugins-ugly: a set of good-quality plug-ins that might pose > > distribution problems > > gst-plugins-bad: a set of plug-ins that need more quality > > --------8<-------- > > (http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/modules/) > > SVN is one (good) thing, but pre-packaging is very bad. Who will decide > whats good and whats not? There is no indipendent way for all styles of > music. Whats good for electro is bad for classical and so on. So > prefiltering is not the right way. Reviewing afterwards regarding to > cases of use is a more fair system.
well, there are some points, that can be used to judge the quality of plugins. if a filter is unstable, it is neither good for electro nor for classical, as you don't hear anything from NANs. tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783 http://tim.klingt.org Avoid the world, it's just a lot of dust and drag and means nothing in the end. Jack Kerouac
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev