Ok: my next question is, given that a software has native alsa support, Jack support, do we need to put some effort into adding 1) pulse audio support and 2) OSS support? Is that a good idea or is it just a waste of time?
Victor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jay Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [LAD] alsa and OSS (again?) >>> Does this mean that pulseaudio is preferred to Jack? >> >> For desktop and user applications yes, for professional audio no. >> > > > There should be no distinction. The fact that there is, means that > the designs are broken. Audio should just plain work - period. > > ; > -- > Jay Vaughan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
