On 23 Jan 2008, at 14:35, Dave Robillard wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 10:10 +0000, Krzysztof Foltman wrote: >> Steve Harris wrote: >> >>> To my mind it's better for us to develop a large suite of tools and >>> plugins to demonstrate the viability and advantages before we go >> >> I think we indeed need lots of testing tools - like debugging >> hosts/plugins spiked with lots of pre/postcondition checks, or even >> some >> validity checking libraries that could be easily inserted (#ifdef'ed) >> into "real" hosts/plugins, to check plugin/host behaviour in "real >> world". > > IMO all the descriptions of restrictions in lv2.ttl that are currently > in comments should be in machine readable form for this reason. > Having > that stuff in comments only is pretty silly, really.
That's a good idea, obviously - but it can be hard to express those kinds of restrictions in a machine readable form, even in RDF :) Also, it will tend to complicate the schema, which is currently quite simple. Perhaps it would make a good adjunct file? tv2-restrictions.ttl or something? - Steve _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev