On Jan 28, 2008 12:07 AM, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:49:48PM +0100, Marek wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2008 10:56 PM, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Well, your interpretation differs greatly from that of the FSF (as well as > >> the vast majority of the GPL camp). I wish you luck evangelizing it. > > > Define vast majority of the GPL camp. Give me the facts, give me the links. > > My statement was based on the assumption that "the vast majority of the GPL > camp" tends to agree with the FSF when interpreting the GPL. > > The FSF's position is clearly stated here: > > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowMoney
The FSF uses bad wording, see my other mail about this. They talk about charging for distribution of sw. > > Have you ever applied the GPL to your own work? What is your interest in > this? No, and as a lawyer i seek to strenghten fair use and appropriate compensation for the use of GPLed software, whether in form of code or money, for the original copyright holders. Marek _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
