Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Stéphane Letz wrote: >> Le 2 août 08 à 02:29, porl sheean a écrit : >> >>> any ideas as to how long before we can hear any info on this thing you >>> are working on? will it be compatible with jack? or is it possible to >>> expand netjackmp to allow communication between arbitrary nodes >>> without sending the audio signals to the master node and back out >>> again? i thought it was possible to do this with the netjackmp >>> implementation but as i said i don't know much on the actual technical >>> abilities of it. >> netjackmp is still point to point, but a more general model would be >> interesting to develop of course. > > There's an added complication to the system I'm developing > these ideas for. In this case all (identical) computers *do* > have their own sound card. The cards are word-clock synced, > but of course the jack periods are not. > A second requirement is that two or more computers must be > able to output (on their soundcard) a signal received from > the network with exact sample sync.
I doubt that it is easy over a transport protocol that doesn't have a global absolute time reference (like ethernet). But FireWire can do this ;). It should not be that difficult to achieve with the current FFADO code base. At one point this worked as a 'proof-of-concept', but it is not considered a priority at the moment. Greets, Pieter _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev