2009/6/18 Damon Chaplin <da...@karuna.eclipse.co.uk> > > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 23:23 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: > > > Sorry, didn't see that. Well, I guess there's no problem on the plugin > > side then... any other possible problems on the host side? > > > > In case there are none, we could add an array or another callback. > > You'd need a way to let the host know if the plugin is version 1.1 or > 1.2. Otherwise the host might try to use the new fields which might be > garbage. > > I can't see a way of getting a LADSPA version number from a plugin at > present. Maybe a ladspa_version() function could be added (outside > LADSPA_Descriptor!), defaulting to 1.1. > > But I'd probably just go for the ladspa_get_port_value_enums() function > and leave LADSPA_Descriptor untouched, just to be safe
You're right. Well, I vote for the extra function and leaving descriptor untouched too. Stefano
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
