Damn Reply-To-All, yet again. On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Vecchione <seabla...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Chuckk Hubbard > <badmuthahubb...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I guess my thought was that people who want to use audio >> professionally are less likely to make decisions based on what >> requires the least effort, which seems to be the main bragging point >> for OSX as well as the main complaint about Linux. >> > > They are more likely to choose what works for them. > > Which for many people OS X works for them out of the box. Linux doesn't > even come close at this point to doing so out of the box for most people. > > So lets say I am an audio professional about to upgrade, ignoring financial > things for the moment for various reasons. I have a choice. I can either > go with OS X and get an experience that works out of the box for what I need > it to. Or I can go with Linux and spend hours learning a new OS and > tinkering with the commandline, before I can even start to work > professionally. > > For many people there isn't much choice there. > > Seablade >
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
