On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:08 +0100, james morris wrote: > I was trying to point to the question of: Why base the replication of a > control port on the replication of the audio ports? The audio port > replication is based on the number of channels, so base the replication > of the control port (if it is to be replicated) on that also.
... the audio port replication IS the "number of channels". > So we have two new port properties: one to say this port should always be > replicated - audio ports would use this - and another to say that this > port can be replicated but does not have to be. The matching of counts > is implied because there's no sane reason why port replication counts > would not match. You are (falsely) assuming the replication is the same across the entire plugin. i.e. there is no global "number of channels" value -dr _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
