On 7 Nov 2009, at 20:15, Chris Cannam wrote: > 2009/11/7 Jörn Nettingsmeier <netti...@folkwang-hochschule.de>: >>> This was a hangover from LADSPA, which had confusing and >>> contradictory >>> claims about what should/shouldn't be used to identify ports. >>> >>> I still don't think there's consensus there. >> >> can you elaborate on this? >> >> archive links would be good, too. > > I think Steve may be thinking of the inflammatory subject of how you > identify plugins, not ports. I'm pretty sure LADSPA ports are always > by number.
Oh you're right, brain fart on my part. Still the port ID in LV2 was a hangover from LADSPA, which was my main point. - Steve _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
