On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:23:54AM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote: > Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > > When I'm not in group 1, I'm hanging out in group 4. > > Inter-host and headless session management is important to > > me, too. > > > > I really do hope that Fons releases his code. :-) > > @Fons, thanks for your reply. It seems that you're not planned to make a > session handler for the mass... That's not bad at all in many cases. > Good luck with it and I hope you decide to release your code. > > Ok, roughly we have 4 groups now (assuming that we can call >1 > individuals a group ;) ) > > Group 1 has spoken, group 3 and group 4. > > What can we expect from group 2? Maybe some of the lash developers > belongs in this group? > Dave, Juuso, Bob Ham, ... ? What are your plans now?
dunno... jack session is frozen now. it took a huge flame war to find out some implications of the requirements. so basically i dont think we can reach consensus. and sessionhandling is _only_ about consensus. its not a problem at all to implement. lad is dead. > > > Regards, > > \r > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev -- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev