On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 23:21 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > Hi Bob, > > thanks for commenting on LADI stuff > > > The huge, major weak point that would prevent me from investing myself > > in LADI is the use of D-Bus which requires an extra, external layer in > > order to perform routing between objects on different buses. See my > > previous mail on the subject here: > > > > http://lalists.stanford.edu/lad/2009/11/0350.html > > > >>From what Nedko has said on IRC, I believe LADISH has such a layer. > > D-Bus *can* span over multiple hosts.
The main issue isn't whether D-Bus clients can connect to buses on a different host. The main issue is whether D-Bus clients connected to one bus can send messages to objects on a different bus. I was actually labouring under the impression that D-Bus as-is could cope with connecting to remote hosts because it uses sockets. That this isn't the case is, in fact *another* problem with D-Bus. D-Bus clients can't send messages to objects on remote buses. As-is, they can't even connect to buses on remote hosts. Shocking. -- Bob Ham <r...@bash.sh> _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev