Loki Davison wrote: > I'd love to know what's weird about libphat :) Crappy yes, weird, > well, maybe. If you'd like to contribute to / totally change direction > of / revive from the dead phat i'd totally approve.
If noone else is interested in picking up libphat I'm willing to do so. I have a bit of a history of maintaining libraries that end up being bedrock parts of the linux audio scene. > Advice thought: > Try and have a specific app that you use and want to make better. It's > a much more effective idea that making something totally generic. > After you make one app better, expand from there. Totally agree. Good advice. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
