>> s. > > well, as i said, it was nothing really conclusive (i'm not going to waste > much time to go from 128/2 to 64/2, diminishing returns...), and my box is > generally under-powered for what i do with it. > > in short, i figured it's not significant really. i merely added this here in > case there's a general picture emerging... it wasn't even intended as > criticism. > > and even if it turned out jack2 would be one step worse than jack1, that's > not at all a big price to pay for smp imho. same with the kernel: an smp > build does degrade performance on an up box, but who cares, really? you can't > even buy up workstations any more, and nature dictates that single-core > performance has hit its limit... > > luck has it that my mobo just got fried, so chances are i'll be contributing > some nice quad-core data in the near future - if only my customers paid their > bills on time... > > > best, > > jörn >
The point is not "criticism" or not ((-: , but if i can get any useful info to see if a real problem still exist or if any kind of regression between 2 versions has happened somewhere.. Stéphane _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
