If you can finance LASH development by giving jobs to 2-3 dedicated coders - it might be a good way to force it. Other than that I am not sure.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Gerald Mwangi <gerald.mwa...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives. > It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply don't seem > to care about session management. So my idea is just to force them to. > Gerald > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:47 +0300, alex stone wrote: > > > > > I disagree with LASH inclusion in jack itself. > > There is work going to consider alternatives at the moment. > > > > Alex. > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev >
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev