On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 02:28:03PM +0100, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, torbenh <torb...@gmx.de> wrote: > > dunno. but wikipedia calls this particular style modern c++ > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_C%2B%2B_Design > > Ah, I see. A neat trick, to give a still relatively esoteric idiom > such a progressive name. One can hardly say "oh no, I don't like to > write modern C++", can one?
i think you can. but i really dont think its so esoteric. the whole boost is using it. and boost is where most of the potential STL additions are maturing. -- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
