On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Robin Gareus <ro...@gareus.org> wrote: > On 06/08/2010 09:07 PM, Chris Cannam wrote: >> So: reply-to-list is better if you have it, but if you don't, use >> reply-to-all. > > mmh "better" in what way?
"better" in that I have seen complaints from people here before about getting duplicate copies from reply-to-all. Using reply-to-list presumably avoids that. I wouldn't really know, I don't have reply-to-list either and don't greatly care. Thought it might cut down some potential objections though. Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
