On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 23:27 +0100, Thomas Mayer wrote: > On 15.12.2010 22:09, Arnold Krille wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:50:19 David Olofson wrote: > >> On Wednesday 15 December 2010, at 19.56.04, Arnold Krille > >> <arn...@arnoldarts.de> wrote: > >> [...] > >> > >>> Some months back fbi had to admit that current encryption is to good for > >>> them. After a year of trying they returned a hard-disk (which Mexican > >>> police asked them to decrypt) admitting they couldn't do anything to get > >>> the data... Went through fefe's blog... > >> > >> ...or maybe the files were just truly random noise from an analog source? > >> ;-) > >> > >> ...or the FBI just *said* they couldn't do it, to lull us all into a false > >> sense of security. > > > > Lets take a rational view: > > Let's go back to paranoia: Theo de Raadt's mail of yesterday > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129236621626462&w=2 > > cu Thomas
Paranoia! I'm sceptic, but I do agree with Arnold, that OpenPGP is relative save. I'm just joking about possibilities to hack OpenPGP. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev