On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:55:04 -0500, David Robillard <d...@drobilla.net>
wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 23:18 +0000, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
[Snip a bunch of irrelevant hand-wavey noise about the past that
completely ignores all discussion about the solution]
...
I have described the various cons in detail. This entire discussion
itself is evidence that there is a problem.
You are essentially arguing (in this latest reply) that all this
bridging stuff should be copy-paste duplicated in every UI instead of
every host (i.e. not considering the UI author's perspective).
Globally,
this is an even worse solution since there are far more plugins than
UIs.
I have described in detail a solution that makes the LV2 UI situation
"de facto toolkit agnostic", which does not require modifying the UI
extension. As far as I can tell, this is a pretty good solution, and
the
only one that doesn't have obvious problems. It meets the needs of
everyone who has voiced them, including you. It solves the
fragmentation/compatibility problems. Do you have any actual feedback
on
this? Particularly, any reasons I have missed why it is not a good
solution? You seem to want to argue "against" me, but there's no
mention
of my proposed solution at all here... unless new information comes
up,
I'll take that as a sign that this is indeed the way to go, and get
on
with doing it.
well, i never said your proposed solution isn't any good, did i?
in fact, i apologise for the noise and wish to sincerely nod and
commend it, by all means.
please do not take my stance on defending the lv2_external_ui as a
counter-argument to your proposal. quite the contrary ;)
carry on
cheers
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rn...@rncbc.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
