On 04/13/2011 01:00 PM, James Morris wrote:
On 13 April 2011 12:44, James Morris<jwm.art....@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 April 2011 12:42, Rui Nuno Capela<rn...@rncbc.org> wrote:
please read your qjackctl/about box whether there's a "JACK Session support
disabled" written in red. that should say it all
Yeah, that says it all :/ Doh. Thanks.
...
The ARCH qjackctl package needs to be rebuilt against the newer JACK
then... ? The release date of the ARCH package is a couple of days
after the release of the recent QjackCtl. Will QjackCTL cope if it was
built with JACK Session support (on machine x) but running (on machine
y) against a JACK without session support?
theoretically yes but murphy may have a different opinion ;)
byee
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rn...@rncbc.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
