On Tuesday 12 July 2011 22:20:48 Olivier Guilyardi wrote: > On 07/12/2011 09:45 PM, Chris Cannam wrote: > > Thinking it over and going back over some references and earlier > > threads here (e.g. much earlier ones from Olivier et al) it does seem > > that this should be enough. This particular situation isn't so > > complicated after all. I think the more I read earlier during this > > thread (and reading around) generally about memory ordering, the more > > I was beginning to feel as if the entire subject was a source of only > > trouble. > > Quite interestingly, I have noticed that discussions about memory barriers > are often somehow endless.
You mean there should be a barrier to discussions about memory barriers? Sorry, couldn't resist...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
