Great, I'll likely be a user then! Was planning on using boost whenever possible anyway.
iain On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Tim Blechmann <t...@klingt.org> wrote: > > Thanks Tim, I'll def check it out. What's the difference to a newbie like > > myself between yours and the one in Jack? > > > > Congrats btw, that's awesome that your work will be in boost! > > the main difference is prbly that the jack ringbuffer is plain c and prbly > needs libjack, while boost.lockfree is a c++ library and header-only. > > cheers, tim > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Tim Blechmann <t...@klingt.org> wrote: > > > > part I need library help with is likely synchronization and > > > > interprocess/interthread communication. ( ie do I use the jack > > > > > > ringbuffer? > > > > > > > Do I look at boost queue implementations? does RAUL have a higher > > > > level > > > > convenience ring buffer? > > > > > > my boost.lockfree library has been accepted and will be shipped with > > > future boost releases. it contains an mpmc-stack, an mpmc-queue and a > > > wait-free spsc > > > ringbuffer (same algorithm as the jack/kernel/supercollider > ringbuffer). > > > > > > git repo: http://tim.klingt.org/git?p=boost_lockfree.git;a=summary > > > (note that the addressing_reviews branch will be the one that will go > > > into boost) > > >
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev