On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:45 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > On 07/31/2012 10:13 PM, David Robillard wrote: > > I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a > > comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html > > Great job! > > Besides dynamic ports, most interesting to me seems to be the > Instruments section, http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html#sec_3.17 > > In short: per voice control of any parameter.
I thought controlling parameters via events in general was the most interesting, particularly since it's related to recent relevant discussion on this list (the buffer size discussion) and an LV2 hot topic lately for a few reasons. Per voice parameters requires this, but is another can of worms. All that's needed there is a convention for what kinds of events to send for note ons and such. It would be relatively simple to build using LV2ey atoms, though some might argue using OSC is more appropriate here since sequencers are more likely to adopt such a standard. Of course, that's another chicken & egg problem... since making a sequencer that would actually do anything useful with this is no small task, this is more of a fantasy feature IMO, plenty of things pragmatically actually needed right now... -dr
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev