On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:02 PM, David Robillard <d...@drobilla.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 11:28 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, David Robillard <d...@drobilla.net> > > wrote: > > > > Is there a reason Jack can't do this for everything? I am not > > really > > keen on putting a bunch of mysterious assembler crap in a host > > meant to > > be a relatively clean example, and it's even worse to make > > plugins have > > to do this... > > > > JACK doesn't get a chance to handle the output of a plugin until the > > host hands it over to JACK and the process cycle ends. Just have a > > reverb plugin outputting denormals and then have the host apply a gain > > value and boom .. JACK can't play a role in that signal flow. > > I mean set the flush-to-zero flag (and/or any other processor state > stuff required). > Ah, yes that would make a certain amount of sense if we called it from the jack thread, somehow.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
