On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 23:44 +0100, Alex Stone wrote: [...] > As a user of NSM, and from that user perspective, it does what it says > on the tin. It's user friendly, and helps administer the process of > starting up my large sessions with no rocket science involved. > > Given the strong wills, and previous scorch marks in the ML about > session management, i have no desire to light a match here, but for > the simple task of starting a succession of apps in a session, NSM > does its job well, imho. > > How much code is required in apps to enable them for NSM use? > > Is there an appetite for at least one session management app that does > the simple stuff well that users can become familiar with as a > "linuxaudio" basic default, as a "unified" community protocol > agreement, without descending into hades and a flame war, in the > interest of taking the community forward, and giving users a better > experience?
Oh boy, *this*, again. In retrospect, replying to this thread at all is surely the dumbest thing I will do today. Nevermind. Have a nice day ;) -dr (Who still thinks a universally restorable format is a nice idea)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
