On Sat, 23 Aug 2014, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 02:48:55PM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
true and not. I just upgraded to the i5 because my older P4, while
able to record audio, was on the edge of being able to deal with the
number of tracks (9 or 10) I was using.
Strange. I've been using a P4 systen until a year ago.
It had no problems at all with 30 tracks or so, many of them
being multichannel. That was with Ardour2. With A3 it failed
on memory (512M), not on CPU load.
I may have been trying to push the latency too low or I was using the
wrong plugins. I was recording the electric guitar direct and using
plugins to make it sound amped. Very little on the vocals of anything save
an aux out to a single reverb. I can't remember what else now.
However, the en/decoding of too many things at the same time was over the
top. The best I could get with skype->pulse->jack->idjc->icecast and back
along with mp3 files decoding to mix in was over 20ms and still not
stable. This is what some people use as a radio studio for internet
radio. The i5 I can set -p32 no problem. Lower latency makes it easier for
a host to converse with someone on the "phone". Skype may not be the best,
but lots of people have it... I don't think pulse was resampling, but it
may have been from 48k to 48k, the mp3s seem to all be 44.1k but they are
decoded straight to jack, so only one resample (as part of the decode?).
You are right that an i7 won't be better than an i5. My current home
system is an i5. It performs better than the i7 in the CdM studio,
which is from the same manufacturer and twice the price.
Have you tried turning "boost" and hyperthreading off in bios? But then
the whole chipset may be different too.
Yes it is simple to keep notes. I would expect it is not a problem
for anyone in this list (it is pretty hard to develop sw without
some sort of organization skills). I have worked with artists who
like to record their work who would find all they could do to make
Ardour work, let alone worry about external gear too.
People should know their limits. And take their time to learn and
move those limits. There's always some effort involved in doing that.
And if they can't do something right, hire someone who can. That is
also an opportunity to learn.
I agree.
So long as
they can get audio recorded they are happy, if a backing track
sounds bad... lower it in the mix.... and blame it on the cheap
equipment that is the best they can afford.
Some (not all) cheap equipment today is better than what most
people could dream of 30 years ago. And a lot of great recording
was done in those days.
Yes, but often people would prefer to blame bad sound from their missuse
on equipment than on themselves. Some people choose not to learn.
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
