"Even if someone some day writes a perfectly working version lv2 version of at1 they won't even bother to try it."
Not necessarily true. On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Fons Adriaensen <f...@linuxaudio.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:08:10PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > > > You can partly blame me, I initially packaged this plugin for KXStudio > > which made it more accessible for users. I should have a) checked the > > source better and b) tested the resulting binary better as it doesn't > > remotely do the job the way Zita-AT1 does. Partial comfort might be that > > others probably recognized the flaws too and the package didn't survive > > time. I'll see what I can do to have the remaining packages and source > > code removed. > > OK, thanks. > > What remains (and I don't blame you for that), is a bunch of users > believing that zita-*** is crap. Even if someone some day writes a > perfectly working version lv2 version of at1 they won't even bother > to try it. > > > As for the violation of the license, don't give in to the Jeff Glatt's > > of this world. > > I won't. Judging from hist posts on LM he must be a complete idiot. > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. > It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris > and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev > -- Louigi Verona http://www.louigiverona.ru/
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev