On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Kjetil Matheussen <k.s.matheus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Paul Davis <p...@linuxaudiosystems.com> > wrote: > >> kjetil, thanks for the patch. >> >> however, the problem with fixing this problem has never been identifying >> where to put the barriers, it has been adding them in a portable way. >> __atomic_* are, as far as i can tell, gcc-specific. am i wrong about that? >> >> > I think you're almost correct. Clang supports them too, so __atomic_* > functions are portable across > linux/osx/mingw for the three major platforms. > > Regarding the microsoft c compiler, which I don't think supports the __atomic_ functions, the "volatile" keyword actually works by default as it should: http://preshing.com/20141024/my-multicore-talk-at-cppcon-2014/ , so in order to support the microsoft c compiler, it's just a matter of creating dummy-macros for the __atomic_-functions.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
