On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:14:01AM -0800, Len Ovens wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, Manuel Haible wrote:
> > >> So low latency is important but sample accuracy not so much. > > The time-shift of sample-streams would be different on each start up, > > right? > > Yes, It depends on how long it takes the bridge to start up and when it gets > started. If the setup is started by a script, it depends on system load > pretty much. (Assuming this is about zita-ajbridge) No, zita-j2a and a2j measures the relative timing of Jack and Alsa periods when starting up. With the -S option (no resampling, assuming word clock sync), this is a single observation and there may be some remaining error. With resampling (no -S) the added latency will converge to a defined value, with only some jitter around this remaining. > > Would it be a good idea to apply an aliasing-filter before feeding the > > zita-resampler? > > No. Indeed no, the anti-aliasing filter is part of the resampling process. To the OP: please, no HTML on this list ! Ciao, -- FA _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
