>
> I am writing to you to let you know that I will hereby remove you from
> this mailing list and permanently ban you from it as well.

I'm not going to discuss whether a post does or does not comply to the rules of 
a mailinglist. But banning and certainly, banning for life, is almost never a 
good solution.

But the problems are much deeper then this. It seems that small a group of 
people are deciding what is appropriate and what not and accidentally they're 
the same people behind the fork of non-session-manager and they now ban the 
developer of the project they forked. Read on.

I hope we all agree that freedom of speech is a precious right. And people are 
free to raise issues and have firm criticism, even while the majority of people 
disagrees. Here a good amount of tolerance is needed and healthy.

Linuxaudio community has a serious problem at the moment I think though, where 
people who have a certain opinion, which is shared by a core group backed up by 
a majority have more freedom of speech and more freedom to misbehave then 
people who are part of a minority or have a less shared opinion or doesn't 
belong to that core group.

It's related to the problem I've raised yesterday on this LAD list, about the 
misuse of the linuxaudio consortium by a small group of people who are 
moderators of linuxaudio.org, github and apparently also the mailinglists. (I 
was not aware of any messages to LAA by the NON developer, timing is 
coincidence). Where the normal neutral linuxaudio consortium is now used to 
release and promote a fork.

Whether you like it or not, those people have to admit there is a conflict of 
interests here and in healthy organizations and communities this should be 
avoided as much as possible.

I don't think it will be fruitful to discuss the details of the fork here again 
or to do a competition who behaved the worst. And this isn't about his 
particular case, it's broader then that.

This community has a problem when it comes to freedom of speech (not all are 
equal) and a conflict of interests (moderators ban developers and release their 
fork from the neutral linuxaudio consortium they moderate).

It's basically a misuse of power by some core members of this community. Let's 
assume it's just a consequence of (group)emotions and ambitions, but it's hard 
to deny and it should be stopped and fixed.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Reply via email to