On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:03:51PM -0400, David G Matthews wrote: > What about using UDP instead of TCP/IP? I don't know a whole lot about > networking, but I do know that jMax uses UDP for interprocess > communication, and I know some people who have experimented with audio > over UDP for real-time work. AFAIK it's a little less reliable than > TCP/IP, but gives lower latencies. I *was* using UDP. TCP is much too slow. - Steve
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Taybin Rutkin
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Joe Pfeiffer
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Vincent Touquet
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Adriaan Pelzer
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Joe Pfeiffer
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Iain Sandoe
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Dan Hollis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Joe Pfeiffer
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Dan Hollis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Vincent Touquet
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Richard C. Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Joe Pfeiffer
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Dan Hollis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Paul Sladen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] It's time to vote (n. 1) Steve Harris