On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:28:14 -0500 Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amen. > > Been there; done that; have no desire to do it again. Resampled 48khz to > 44.1 khz sounds worse to my ears than the D/A->A/D converted signal. That depends completely on the way the resampling is done. To generalise and say resampled always sounds worse is plain and simply wrong. I do admit your statement could well be true for the equipment you are using > But, I have always used Panasonic SV3700's, which work very well for 44.1khz > rates. I currently am able to do S/PDIF with an older SV3200 chassis (and an > SV3700 transport in it -- reverse of my normal!) into my Layla. Too bad Echo > has been brain-dead about Linux drivers. > > I always run the sample clocks at an integer multiple of 44.1khz. IMHO, 88.2 > sounds better than 96, if the result is going on Red Book CD. Run an > analysis...... :-) Is this in double blind testing? :-) Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Fifty years of programming language research, and we end up with C++ ???" --Richard A. O'Keefe
