Hi, Junichi Uekawa hat gesagt: // Junichi Uekawa wrote: > ladspa-sdk is distributed as a tarball, and > ladspa.h is part of it. > > I see no problem in a SDK package containing some > example code.
I even think, that this is the right thing (tm) to do from a packager's point of view. Of course, LADSPA per definition is ladspa.h, but it would be rather useless to have a package that only includes one file. It's more the other way around: Which package provides ladspa.h? Ah, it's ladspa-sdk and installing it, I get some examples and docs for free. ciao, -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
