On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Juan Linietsky wrote: > Yes! This is super just exactly accuratedly the point of what I was > proposing. My point is simply that not all apps you'd like to > route/interconnect need low latency, thus there is no need to use JACK > natively on them. When the app tries to open an audio in / audio out > channel with alsa, it registers as a plug into the JACK subsystem. > Since It doesnt need to work low latencyish, the JACK programs will > work perfect with them.
This is what you want. This is from december. It just needs someone to implement it: "Thats why getting alsa-server to participate in JACK would be great: this would allow all regular ALSA apps to use JACK without its sample-sync features. The other way around doesn't work: all the sample-sync-needing apps would fail to get what they wanted/expected/needed if they just use alsa-server." This quote can be found here: http://eca.cx/lad/2001/Dec/0189.html Taybin
