Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:27:25PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> > Steve Harris wrote:
> >
> > >On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 12:21:59 +0100, Richard W.E. Furse wrote:
> > >> I've put a provisional version of the LADSPA SDK including the LADSPA v1.1
> > >> header file at
> > >>
> > >>    http://www.ladspa.org/ladspa_sdk_dev.tgz
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if this looks alright - and if I've done anything stupid!
> > >
> > >Just did a quick diff -b -u of ladspa.h and applyplugin.c, looks great to
> > >me.
> >
> > said it then, will say it again:
> >
> > the proposed mechanism for default values is a kludge.
> >
> > i'm against it.
> 
> Me too. It doesnt provide a real default value and still is so complex
> and ugly nobody wants to implement support for this.

I agree. Tim's and Conrad's suggestions made much more sense. This is a
bad hack and not a thought through solution with bad side-effects on the
quality of ladspa.

Silvia.

> 
> Richard.
> 
> >
> > tim
> 
> --
> --

Reply via email to