Good.  Now I believe my perspective.  Thanks!
Peter

David Gerard Matthews wrote:

> Hello,
> The Hammerfall has a great reputation, but it might be more 
> cost-effective to go with one of the M-Audio cards if you don't need 
> 16-24 channels of audio.  The biggest selling point of the Hammerfall 
> cards (besides their legendary low-latency performance) is the massive 
> number of channels, and the ability to use external converters. 
> However, if you're not going to be using external D/A's, or a digital 
> mixer, then you're probably better off going with a card that uses an 
> external breakout box for the A/D/A, because that offers better 
> isolation from the CPU than you would get from the Hammerfall's 
> daughterboards.  I personally use an M-Audio Delta 1010 and have been 
> quite happy with its performance under Linux; other cards from 
> manufacturers like Terratec which also use the Envy24 chipset should 
> work well too.  All of this, of course, is not meant on a diss on the 
> Hammerfall cards - they really are great cards, however, if you're 
> mostly just doing CSound, with a bit of analog tape transfer, it 
> probably is severe overkill.
> HTH,
> dgm pma wrote:
>
>> Hi, Everyone.
>>
>> As my digital-audio-hardware savvy is wanting, I would much 
>> appreciate any critique of the following (not very long) purchase 
>> proposal.
>>
>> My old sound card, a vintage '91 MTU MicroSound running with Csound 
>> under MS-Windows, died recently.   I am in search of a replacement, 
>> to run in a newer
>> box under Debian Linux.   My use of the system use will consist 
>> mainly of Csound generation to disk (no realtime issues) and the 
>> CD-burning of selected results.  I'll want to hear directly from disk 
>> too, and record occasionally from analog tape.
>>
>> My proposed solution is an RME Hammerfall Lite, together with its two 
>> analog expansion boards, the AEB4-I & AEB4-O.   If I understand, the 
>> main board on its own will format output appropriately for audio-CD, 
>> but requires the AEB4-I to record from analog sources, and requires 
>> the AEB4-O to play directly from disk.
>>
>> Question 1:  Do I understand these essentials correctly?   (Already 
>> have also the ALSA-0.9 sources, CD-burner, amplifier and speakers.)
>>
>> Question 2:  Does the RME constitute overkill -- for someone mainly 
>> wanting  sound _quality_ (not whatever new fancy functionalities) in 
>> his old-fashioned style of use?   If a simpler alternate could serve 
>> me as well, any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your time.
>> Peter
>>
>
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to