This smells funny. "Unfortunately, because the UI is infringing, I can't distribute the source." There are so many ways around that that it's not funny, starting with the most basic -- removing the "reborn.rma" file from the distribution. I don't want to question this fellow's motives -- especially since DMCA-happy companies are ever more and more absurd -- but I wouldn't be surprised if this was fabricated to drum up publicity for his next project. Hopefully, it will be jackified, midi-controllable, and GPLed; because those alone would have made reborn ultra-cool (not just, as it is, "cool").
OTOH, since the main contributions of ReBorn seem to be a ReBirth-like UI for gsynth and for two sample players as well as a reader for ReBirth files, propellerheads might have some legal ground to stand on. (The name is certainly confusing from a trademark standpoint.) But isn't Sweden (where propellerheads is) immune to look-and-feel copyrights and software patents? As for finding reborn -- submit the story to slashdot and within minutes, it will be posted with some melodramatic screed about "megacorporations", and at least thirty people will offer links to their mirrors of it in the comments. wb On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:33:47PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I jsut went to finally give it a try, and found out there is no more > > reborn, it has been shut down. > > I wish I hade downloaded when I hade the time > > What? It's a shame he won't fight this. INAL, but isn't the user > interface non-copyrightable? > > Taybin > -- Will Benton | "Die richtige Methode der Philosophie wäre eigentlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] | die: Nichts zu sagen, als was sich sagen läßt...."
