Steve Harris wrote: > I think there is a need for an inprocess only host/plugin >system, like LADSPA, but more suphisticated though. > >> i'm not so sure it would be such a big problem to code -- jack is >> very 'cross-process' by concept. the current jack graph can already >> be thought of as 'shared' among and 'controlled' by all clients. > >I guess its not fundamentally different from a mixture of IP and OP >clients, which jack was intended to support.
what i am trying to steer towards is an approximation of 'plugins' and 'applications'. if both interface with the same system-wide graph in the same way we get possibilities for free that must be coded over and over again with the 'monolithic' application designs we currently have. (by which i also mean .so-based designs that force you to do source/header reading and coding before connecting.) tim
