On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 07:48:55 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote: > >OK, why do they use two shapers? Or is it one cheby and one non polynomial? > > two chebyshevs, blend factor depending on incoming amplitude.
Thats interesting, cos liiing at your waterfall plot it doesn;t seem liek that should be enough. > >Yeah, I'm thinking we're not tackling it right, if behringer can knock out > >a virtual amp harware box for E150 it can't the that cycle hungry. > > funny; now that i'm losing some skepticism about the approach > you seem to pick it up. I odnt think that Line 6 and co. are using chebys, I think there using something more like our first attempt. That's not based on any knowledge or anything, just a hunch. - Steve
