> > Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an > > instrument API must not support it? > > Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies > that LADSPA will still be simpler.
yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important. Tim
