On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> Tim Hockin wrote: > > > > > > Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an > > > > instrument API must not support it? > > > > > > Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies > > > that LADSPA will still be simpler. > > > > yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to > > ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important. > > Linux Audio Developers' More Sophisticated Plugin API (=LADMSPA) ? :-D > LADLUP - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API. --
