On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:35:16 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > > Maybe. My objection to converters is more that they imply two > > parallel representations of frequency (in the broad sense of the > > word), which seems like a mistake. > > They are not parallel. One actually *is* frequency, while the other > expresses pitch in relation to a scale. > > It's like comparing inline code with calls through function pointers, > basically.
I dont see how, its more like having a string and int representation of the same thing. - Steve