On Friday 13 December 2002 12.32, Steve Harris wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:27:07 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > > Sort by dependencies... But is there any obvious way of dealing > > with feedback loops, or do you explicitly have to specify where > > you want the delay? Maybe there should just be a way of hinting > > delay sensitive connections for when you actually have problems? > > Yes, I would maybe do what pd does and execute the modules in > layout order. Though I think pd goes right to left and bottom to > top, which seems backwards. Maybe I've remebered it wrong.
Well, the *dependencies* are in the reverse order, in relation to the processing... (Not that I know if pd worries about dependencies at all. :-) > If you > know that is happening you can layout the graph so it will execute > correctly. > > Alternativly just order them by placement sequence (though users > find that confusing apparently ;) or sort by dependencies and pick > somewhere at random for the delay. And if you can do the latter, you could pick the specified connecton instead of some random place. //David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate .- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------. | Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. | | RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. | `---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -' .- M A I A -------------------------------------------------. | The Multimedia Application Integration Architecture | `----------------------------> http://www.linuxdj.com/maia -' --- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
