On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Paul Davis wrote:
> >> for myself, because its already possible to run pd as a JACK client, > >> the only interesting thing that i see in this effort is a push to ask > >> the question: does pd in fact run much better than JACK at the same > >> latency/buffer settings, and if so, why? > >> > >Oops, sorry for not making that question clear. I thought it was > >obvious actually. > > the question or the answer? > > and how well does pd handle moving 9-18MB/sec through its interaction > with an audio interface? ie. the read/write access model requires lots > of extra data copying. > I dont understand what you are talking about. Someone at the pd-dev list perhaps knows. All I know is that I get very descent realtime performance in pd as a normal user (even when running locate, starting new programs, etc. at the same time). I cant get that sort of performance with jack. Have you tried k_jack now by the way? I'm not making jokes about its performance. --
