On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 07:15:07 -0500, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Steve Harris wrote: > > > MAS itsself its not suitable for RT audio*, but I suggested that we might > > want some MAS<->JACK interfaces for network transparent audio, and left a > > bussiness card, they seemed enthusiastic, but I never heard back from the > > MAS guys. > > Yes, I spoke to them too at LinuxWorld and thought that a MAS driver for > Jack would be a pretty neat thing, if one didn't care so much about > network latency.
Agreed, for RT operation then 1494 is probably the way to go, but when you dont care about latency (or quality*) MAS is good too. * IIRC MAS silently resamples, so I wouldn't use it in my studio. It would be fine for playing mp3s though. - Steve