On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:18:47 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: > I had a vague attempt at doing something like this (after noticing that > filters filtering silence uses up a lot of cpu). Each sample buffer object
OT: Thats probably because the zeros weren't 0.0, they were probably denormal numbers. If you squash them the filter will run at the same cost as when its processing any other data. - Steve