Hallo, nikodimka hat gesagt: // nikodimka wrote: > >Well, why not extend some of the existing softsynths? That's what I > >do: Because I'm too lazy to write gui code I write Pd externals. The > >GUI part can be quickly done inside Pd (and every other user could do > >their own). jMax or SSM also come to mind > > Its only a half of solution. > Can I "compile" or "render" the resulting engine into single > executable? > I feel pretty uncomfortable when instead of using a small > self-contained synth I have to load its guts into editing > environment.
I don't quite see why you want or what you mean with "a single executable". For example Pd is a single executable. It only loads and runs the objects one uses in a certain patch. If the small Tk GUI of Pd really is too much for a machine then it is possible to run without it. For a compiled language SFront might be used, where in the end the synth description is actually compiled with a C compiler into a synth. ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__