Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> >But, I would much prefer to do that than to take on the extra
> >maintenance load for yet another driver (we already have three).
> 
> i welcome as many drivers as people can provide, on the understanding
> that they will not necessarily be maintained by anyone except the
> contributor, and if the internal API changes (as has happened between
> 0.80 and 0.90) and the driver is not ported, it will be removed from
> the Makefiles.

That may be clear to the driver writers, but it won't make any sense
to users filing bug reports in Mantis because one of our supported
features doesn't work on their hardware.  If you really want to wash
your hands of all responsibility for this code, it needs to come from
some other package, *not* from JACK CVS.
-- 
  joq

Reply via email to